After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures across Europe, fresh technologies are now reviving these types of systems. From lie diagnosis tools tested at the line to a program for verifying documents and transcribes selection interviews, a wide range of solutions is being used in asylum applications. This article explores www.ascella-llc.com/portals-of-the-board-of-directors-for-advising-migrant-workers how these systems have reshaped the ways asylum procedures will be conducted. That reveals just how asylum seekers will be transformed into pressured hindered techno-users: They are asked to abide by a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and keep up with unstable tiny changes in criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs their particular capacity to find the way these devices and to follow their right for safeguards.
It also displays how these technologies are embedded in refugee governance: They facilitate the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a flutter of spread technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by hindering all of them from getting at the programs of safeguard. It further states that examines of securitization and victimization should be coupled with an insight in the disciplinary mechanisms of technologies, through which migrants are turned into data-generating subjects whom are self-disciplined by their reliance on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal expertise, the article states that these solutions have an inherent obstructiveness. They have a double impact: when they aid to expedite the asylum process, they also help to make it difficult meant for refugees to navigate these types of systems. They are really positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes these people vulnerable to bogus decisions created by non-governmental actors, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their cases. Moreover, that they pose fresh risks of’machine mistakes’ that may result in erroneous or discriminatory outcomes.